If you haven’t read the article, you will miss it
If you’ve read the article that touched on the latest midrange debate, you’ll be forgiven for thinking about what all the hubs were. Of course, Zach Lavine is unhappy that the Bulls have told him to stop shooting midrange shots, but that’s not explosive news. Joe Cowley, writing for the Chicago Sun-Times, used Lavin’s quote as a way to insult statistic analysts and “analytical bloggers,” but it’s not a novel. The media has been waging a perceived tribal war between Jokes and Nard for decades to get more attention.
Rachel Nichols and ESPN picked it up and Kevin Durant jumped
But Rachel Nichols and ESPN picked it up and Kevin Durant jumped into the discussion arguing with Matt Moore on Twitter and so again, is basketball cognoscenti discussing whether it is really understandable to take less?
The odd part of the debate is that it is not a matter of belief or opinion, let alone debate on abortion law. This is a matter of competition. When it comes to abortion, both parties have a moral argument and the goal is to convince the other party. But the beauty of sports is not the goal – it’s the victory. There is no subjective judge. The courtroom is the courtroom.
Do you know who still loves that we’re still debating this? The Houston Rockets have taken the fewest midrange shots in each of the last seven seasons and have finished in the top 11 in every offense this year, including being in the top four for more than half of the season.
The way “avoid midrange” of the controversy
They are as convinced as the “avoid midrange” of the controversy. But they’re not crazy that there are still important holdouts. They are not trying to explain that the league is right. They are just laughing all the way to the win-win column.
Before you go out preaching the good news of eliminating midrange shots, however, did you know who else had the top five offenses last year? San Antonio Spurs who are the same Spurs who have taken the most midrange shots in the NBA. It has made the top ten offenses in three of San Antonio’s last four seasons and has taken midrange shots more than almost every team.
This problem is not black-and-white. Usefulness is needed to determine which shots are good shots and which are bad. Statistics that are often lost in a debate where volume 11 becomes.
The team will hopefully score more
Not all midrange shots are made equally. Not all threes are made equally. A team will score more by trying thirty more than saying and like saying fewer midrange shots less, someone will recover by eating less and drinking more. That may be true – unless they eat less whole foods and more soda. Detailed topics. We can’t talk so broadly and say that all midrange is bad and all Trisha is just like we can’t say that all food is bad and all drink is good. We need to be more specific here.
With 15 long two contests, the shooter is Kevin Durant and he is playing with a bench unit, which could be the best shot for the team. Lavine is right when he says the playoff defenses are ready to remove the rims and threes and so may be able to hit the midrange shot. The context changes our analysis, so it is foolish to have this debate without acknowledging the context.
Why this was true in all levels of the game.
This is true for all levels of the game. When I work for the team, I often play with the staff. Almost every time I took a midrange shot the coaches would laugh and tell me jokingly, how can I advise to reduce the midrange shot in the NBA, but I took these shots when I got on the court. I laughed and replied: “If I could do it right, I wouldn’t take the midrange jumper.”
These were all in jest, but there is truth. I’m 5-9 and I can’t jump. The NBA’s three-point distance was an adjustment for me when I first played it. I’m a decent shooter, so if I get an open midrange shot it’s a good shot for me. Needless to say, Zach Lavine and I are very different. He can do things like this if you one to read more.